A few weeks ago, when I was at the Touch and Go festival, I ran into a friend of AZ and mine who now works for Britannica. He intimated that the company was thinking more about social software, in no small part because of the mindshare challenges presented by Wikipedia [eb | wp] et al. to the commercial underpinnings of Britannica.
I thought a bit about the conversation over the course of the evening, but didn't get to put any thoughts down before the splendrous noise of Scratch Acid pushed the thoughts to the back of my mind.
Well, it looks like one of the first pieces of that evolution he discussed is coming to pass, in the form of Britannica Blog, a multi-author weblog from some of the producers at Britannica. It's early days yet, but with some good fortune and some more transparency, maybe they'll be able to show the institutional side of the knowledge-editorial story. There's more social outreach to be done by this grey lady of the libraries, but it looks like they're making a decent start.
What else could they do? Off the top of my head, some ideas I'd steal from the social software movement:
Obviously, from the inside these are hard, difficult questions. There's multiple (and sometimes competing) fiduciary responsibilities at play - to the knowledge and accrued information that makes the Britannica product, to the historical strength of that editorial content, and to the corporate ownership of that information and rights thereto. A balance is, doubtlessly, an ongoing game.
{aside: I would have linked to EB across the external links in this, but couldn't due to lack of content, unless specifically noted the links are to Wikipedia, despite the experimental attempt}
Technorati Tags: collaboration, encyclopediaBritannica, purple, tags, wikipedia
Two updates based on Gapers Block this week...
Diner breakfasts, ice cream and mental and physical balance? Who can resist this combo plate?
Technorati Tags: food
A few weeks ago I woke up from a dream with an idea and left myself the note below.
Anyone have a clue as to what it means? It looks vaguely work related, but utterly indecipherable to me in my waking state. Could I have been designing a captcha scheme for jungian dream interpretation?
While discussing an early 90s pop masterpiece:
Well, that's debatable. Smack is not known as the smart people's drug of choice.
Ah, mornings at KJ North.
During a brief sojourn driving across the state and stopping for visits, I discovered and rediscovered many things - three quick pickhits, and one observation for the moment:
Can't wait to go back for a less hectic (well, less than 5 cities in 5 days) visit soon!